Epstein

I think it demonstrates, there's a lot more to come. Mandelson's partner was given quite a £wedge from Epstein.
And it is now revealed what a total money-whore Sarah Ferguson is.
Lots more to come. It probably won't surprise anyone, but the email exchanges are just degradingly bad and utterly humiliating. 😀 😀
 
Like the Manchurian Candidate....you can almost predict who will be implicated by all of their previous behaviours (& opinions). The more Globalist Liberal Left, the higher the probability of having the knickers around their ankles.


 
Almost surprisingly, after all the humiliation David Icke got, he has been proved to be exceptionally close to the bulls eye
 
Last edited:
Mandelson gone.
First of many and karma
Don’t wish too hard as you might get what you wish for !
An absolute scumbag.

It makes you wonder about the integrity of some of his political friends. Especially the ones who seem to remain in positions of influence despite having been exposed as charlatans.

How about it Tony Blair.
 
The more that’s released the less we actually know. Whether that is deliberate obscuration is difficult to work out.

That Epstein had connections with both the political hierarchy and the rich and famous is unarguable. That he was used by intelligence forces to gather information and exercise influence, perhaps even control, seems probable.

That many of the pictures that are surfacing were taken without the subject’s knowledge also seem very likely, given their character and the strength of the denials. That some were then used against them seems likely. Who knows whether the emails, and other documents, are genuine, or planted to incriminate?

What this leaves is a fog of information and misinformation in which total clarity is impossible. Some conclusions will be possible when overwhelming numbers of witness statements support the documentary evidence. In many other instances no conclusion is possible, although that won’t stop them being drawn.
 
An absolute scumbag.

It makes you wonder about the integrity of some of his political friends. Especially the ones who seem to remain in positions of influence despite having been exposed as charlatans.

How about it Tony Blair.
Always assumed his "career" was based on the pi$$ing out of the tent principle. He knows where the bodies are buried having buried most of them himself.
 
The more that’s released the less we actually know. Whether that is deliberate obscuration is difficult to work out.

That Epstein had connections with both the political hierarchy and the rich and famous is unarguable. That he was used by intelligence forces to gather information and exercise influence, perhaps even control, seems probable.

That many of the pictures that are surfacing were taken without the subject’s knowledge also seem very likely, given their character and the strength of the denials. That some were then used against them seems likely. Who knows whether the emails, and other documents, are genuine, or planted to incriminate?

What this leaves is a fog of information and misinformation in which total clarity is impossible. Some conclusions will be possible when overwhelming numbers of witness statements support the documentary evidence. In many other instances no conclusion is possible, although that won’t stop them being drawn.
It's a little surprising that more concrete evidence hasn't come to light. You would guess that a man like Epstein would have cameras and recording equipment all over the place.
 
The more that’s released the less we actually know. Whether that is deliberate obscuration is difficult to work out.

That Epstein had connections with both the political hierarchy and the rich and famous is unarguable. That he was used by intelligence forces to gather information and exercise influence, perhaps even control, seems probable.

That many of the pictures that are surfacing were taken without the subject’s knowledge also seem very likely, given their character and the strength of the denials. That some were then used against them seems likely. Who knows whether the emails, and other documents, are genuine, or planted to incriminate?

What this leaves is a fog of information and misinformation in which total clarity is impossible. Some conclusions will be possible when overwhelming numbers of witness statements support the documentary evidence. In many other instances no conclusion is possible, although that won’t stop them being drawn.
Incredible that you try to mitigate the actions of these people.
 
It's a little surprising that more concrete evidence hasn't come to light. You would guess that a man like Epstein would have cameras and recording equipment all over the place.
I think that evidence is in the 1 million pages that have been partly or completely redacted, under the guise of protecting the victims.
 

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top