You NEED people to believe this country you profess to apparently be such of a patriot of is in terminal decline as it is the only way you will ever get your sadistic little hard on dream of authoritarianism and whatever it is you think you’re going to do your ‘enemies’.
I just want to answer this point because it's important to me that what I actually want is clear from what I think is actually going to happen. They aren't the same thing.
Just because I make a prediction of something it doesn't mean I'm delighted and eager.
To be fair to myself I think I have made this clear many many times but then we get Dan with his apparent low interest levels with understanding arguments painting you as having advocated for something else.
To repeat....Democracy works best in homogeneous societies. The more you dilute a society into different fractions (racial, cultural, class) then the harder it becomes....A few and you're good. The more you add the harder it gets. The cohesion requires ensuring that 'keeping together' is better than 'disunity' and that translates into the country economically being successful enough.
Now this point isn't just about immigration, it covers the extent of philosophical and cultures diversity as well as the level of economic distance between elite/wealthy/middleclass/workingclass/underclass. It's important that's understood.
But for the sake of brevity as immigration is the usual most contenuous point I'll focus on that....but I repeat, it's not the only issue.
So obviously I am a significant critic of importing diverse racial groups into a country because it weakens cohesion.....When the numbers are low, maybe half will adapt and integrate (commonly the most talented because it pays) but the higher the numbers the less integration you get.
It's basic 101 human nature. A minority or people who consider themselves a minority will in the high percentage of cases (not all) vote against and act against the host majority interest and look to differential themselves.
Again basic 101 human nature.
This is not a dislike of other races (every group has great and good people...for example Braverman today), it's an understanding of how human societies work on the large scale.
This is common sense in most parts of the world.
Unlike what you suggest I'm not a fan of authoritarianism. I've always said on here that the natural state of man lies within decentralised systems and that means freedom from authoritarianism.
However that status only works within a framework of cohesion....and only an idiot thinks you get that by importing lots of cultures because obviously 'birds of a feather' happens in large enough numbers.
So the fact that societies like ours and in the US will become increasingly authoritarian (and this is just one aspect of why) isn't something I'm cheering on, it's something that the establishment within those societies are going to increasingly resemble as a reaction against the increasing disunity caused by their own policies.
Because at the end of the day the establishment only cares about itself....not truth, not fairness....just power.....Social media has just sped it all up....widening cracks that were always there.....When the economy breaks the only thing keeping them together ends....in reaction people resort to safety, which are their trusted groups.
It's human nature.
I get annoyed that people ignore nature and instead just virtue signal about fantasies.