New Year's Resolutions......2026

Hopefully one of you will get laid this year.

Or at least talk to a woman again.

Maybe one of you will get to see the kids again too.

Most of "us" have already procreated and passed on our genes. Have you?
 
Hopefully one of you will get laid this year.

Or at least talk to a woman again.

Maybe one of you will get to see the kids again too.
i am good at doing impressions.

"no, that's not what you said...."

"no, thats not what you meant, what you really meant to say was....."

"what you are really saying is....."


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Year's Resolution.......to spend less time explaining myself and getting entangled in trivial semantics.
 
Most of "us" have already procreated and passed on our genes. Have you?

He has, but he's on the wind up because he knows most of us have.

What's amusing is him pushing the idea that not being right wing gets you access to more women. You often find this line being pushed by lefty activists as a kind of cope.

In the real world, what they are pushing isn't how it works.....On the attraction level most women are more interested in status/money/success than your politics...it's not even close...Tate, for example is an arse, but he literally has a harem.

Data on this kind of thing is hard to find but using Grok it tells me that 'Republicans and conservatives generally report higher marriage rates overall (e.g., 65% of Republicans aged 25–64 are married vs. 50% of Democrats) and greater marital happiness (65% of married Republicans report being "very happy" vs. 54% of Democrats).'

'In mixed-ideology couples, divorce rates appear low (e.g., only 2–6% defection in opposite-party marriages over a decade), suggesting politics alone isn't a major driver.'

The 'I'm not with you unless you're a (include politics) is just less common than activists assume it is'.....because of course they do.

Personally I don't think your politics factors too much into whether you have relationships as there are plenty of birds of a feather out there.....and the current Reform polling shows you that right wing politics isn't the deal breaker most lefty activists like to think it is.

They accuse you of being in bubbles and ignore their own.
 
Last edited:
When you liberate women unabated in the ways he upholds you end up with the likes of Bonnie Blue as outcomes on the extreme end simply because beauty and sexuality are a dominant feature for women. They don't suddenly become positive role models in the same way as men do, because, surprisingly to him, we're different.
 
When you liberate women unabated in the ways he upholds you end up with the likes of Bonnie Blue as outcomes on the extreme end simply because beauty and sexuality are a dominant feature for women. They don't suddenly become positive role models in the same way as men do, because, surprisingly to him, we're different.

Mental illness is higher on the left.

So when you get all this, 'you're in the basement' stuff, it's just their cope.

It's also hypocritical because they are suggesting you are mentally ill adapted when that's literally a group they celebrate and seek to protect.....if they are left wing.

So the usual lack of principle.
 
There I was thinking this was a thread about New Year's resolutions! You lads are so obsessed with each other it's quite sweet.

Back to the topic...

Watch more films
Read more books
Attend more live music
Regularly attend ParkRun to attempt 5k in 20 mins or less
And lastly enjoy as much of Palace as possible, as I'm in no doubts these are the 'good times'!

Happy New Year everyone
 
There I was thinking this was a thread about New Year's resolutions! You lads are so obsessed with each other it's quite sweet.

Back to the topic...

Watch more films
Read more books
Attend more live music
Regularly attend ParkRun to attempt 5k in 20 mins or less
And lastly enjoy as much of Palace as possible, as I'm in no doubts these are the 'good times'!

Happy New Year everyone

Good resolutions...though lots of modern films nowadays are garage and my knees aren't up for 5K.
Happy New Year to yourself!
 
What's amusing is him pushing the idea that not being right wing gets you access to more women. You often find this line being pushed by lefty activists as a kind of cope.

the paradox being Lefties seek to fill their own environ with : a) single unattached men and b) with cultures that break your legs if you even look at 'their women', while they can happily chase after your young sister - impregnate her and scarper.

Notwithstanding that even if a fella lived in a lefty women's vegetarian commune, he is more likely to get pushed out an upstairs window than get laid in an endearing relationship.

The best chances an average fella ever had of success with the ladies ? that was 1946 Soviet Union....irrespective of any ideology. And the worst place in history ? is either Wild West Gold Rush towns......all men. Or Western Europe today.
 
Last edited:
Ye I agree there's a lot of mainstream rubbish released but there's still some good stuff coming out every now and then and it's nice to support it at the cinema.

I agree with you....a future with no cinemas isn't great, just like our city centres degrading from their former glories....but it's hard to see it not happening.

The Naked Gun movie last year was certainly good.
 
the paradox being Lefties seek to fill their own environ with : a) single unattached men and b) with cultures that break your legs if you even look at 'their women', while they can happily chase after your young sister - impregnate her and scarper.

Notwithstanding that even if a fella lived in a lefty women's vegetarian commune, he is more likely to get pushed out an upstairs window than get laid in an endearing relationship.

Feminism added with dating apps has certainly made it much harder for both men and women in the modern age.

initially women think it gives them an advantage, but when you look at outcomes for them the opposite is true....it's mostly only better for the top five to ten percent of either sex....For most it's just bad.

Back before the technology, what studies we have report women being happier than today.....and the reason is obvious, those that would normally be getting married and having families just aren't at the same rates and ages....anti depressants are in much higher use.

It makes sense from my personal experiences of remembering the women in my family when I was young, friends of my grandmother for example.

They basically ran households and had had families which meant they were important people to sons and daughters and so on.....they weren't going to be dying alone with no family surrounding them.

The effect of modern tech and feminism has stripped that future from many women today and lied to them about what future will be for many.....The modern system is great for the good looking attractive 20 year old.....But that turns into a big disadvantage a decade later for a much higher percent.
 
The effect of modern tech and feminism has stripped that away from women today and lied to them about what future it provides.....great for the good looking attractive 20 year old.....But that turns into a big disadvantage a decade later for a much higher percent.
if you consider the last few decades of elderly women who died. Most married young, had a good number of kids, and only had a tiny number of romantic partners. A median of maybe 1 partner, and an average of maybe 2 or 3, with a small number of outlier women who had more than 5 partners in their life. Women were married and mothers at age 21.

Today ? aged 30 ? has she been with ten , twenty or fifty fellas ? RiP her ability to long-term pair-bond with a fella. Certainly without constantly googling her rights on Divorce - and looking over the garden fence at Brad Pitt on the dating app.
 
He has, but he's on the wind up because he knows most of us have.

What's amusing is him pushing the idea that not being right wing gets you access to more women. You often find this line being pushed by lefty activists as a kind of cope.

In the real world, what they are pushing isn't how it works.....On the attraction level most women are more interested in status/money/success than your politics...it's not even close...Tate, for example is an arse, but he literally has a harem.

Data on this kind of thing is hard to find but using Grok it tells me that 'Republicans and conservatives generally report higher marriage rates overall (e.g., 65% of Republicans aged 25–64 are married vs. 50% of Democrats) and greater marital happiness (65% of married Republicans report being "very happy" vs. 54% of Democrats).'

'In mixed-ideology couples, divorce rates appear low (e.g., only 2–6% defection in opposite-party marriages over a decade), suggesting politics alone isn't a major driver.'

The 'I'm not with you unless you're a (include politics) is just less common than activists assume it is'.....because of course they do.

Personally I don't think your politics factors too much into whether you have relationships as there are plenty of birds of a feather out there.....and the current Reform polling shows you that right wing politics isn't the deal breaker most lefty activists like to think it is.
Genghis Khan must have been a regular Owen Jones.
 
Genghis Khan must have been a regular Owen Jones.
there are many lessons in the Genghis Khan story.

- nice fellas finish last
- chicks dig jerks

- humans struggle to create a society as monogamous as that of Emperor Penguins.

- Wealth will mostly beat 'good looks', personality or being a good conversationalist. For women, 'relative-poverty' is a better aphrodisiac than Spanish-Fly ( which doesn't work).
- the winner takes it all.......just ask Elon Musk.

- when you pay women to reproduce with unemployed losers, your society will soon all resemble ( insert name of poorest town in the UK ).


----------------------

anyhoo.........New Year's Resolutions. After the 2nd of January, i will only be on HOL on match-days. My right-wing ranting is better valued on x-twitter. Thank you Elon.
 
Last edited:
This year will be like previous years for me. Try and resist the onset of old age and look after the people I care about.

Nothing else really matters.
 
Feminism added with dating apps has certainly made it much harder for both men and women in the modern age.

initially women think it gives them an advantage, but when you look at outcomes for them the opposite is true....it's mostly only better for the top five to ten percent of either sex....For most it's just bad.

I agree with your post but stripped out stuff I don't nee to comment on. There is one group that has had a massive uplift with dating apps, that is the top 10% of men. Hypergamy gives them this access. You can even find some of these types on YT giving dating advice - they are oblivious to the fact that advice has little to do with it because women will ignore any red flag for a chance with a top tier guy - these guys will show you their likes, and there are way way more than the other 90% get. There are reports of women happy to trot off to his place and be told "Bedroom is there, I'll be in shortly", then chucked out after they've been hammered - and women seem to get their hopes up over this. I know of a 53 year old woman who is shagging a 30 year old married bloke who is in good shape on Tinder, she knows the score - in what world would that be reversed? It wouldn't.

With this going on the top women are sharing their top bloke, that's something that just has to happen, but women are ok with this because psychologically the guy comes with approval from the other females who are flocking.

This is utterly irrelevant to the OP, but then again, it was derailed by the soy boy.
 
women will ignore any red flag for a chance with a top tier guy - these guys will show you their likes, and there are way way more than the other 90% get. There are reports of women happy to trot off to his place and be told "Bedroom is there, I'll be in shortly", then chucked out after they've been hammered - and women seem to get their hopes up over this.
Similar to most other mammals. Females are happier to share an alpha-male than to compromise their higher expectations.
I know of a 53 year old woman who is shagging a 30 year old married bloke who is in good shape on Tinder, she knows the score - in what world would that be reversed? It wouldn't.
that is a symptom of the gender inequality in our society. Even a women in her 70's has options.
With this going on the top women are sharing their top bloke, that's something that just has to happen, but women are ok with this because psychologically the guy comes with approval from the other females who are flocking.
its not the top women. Its all the women chasing after the top bloke. Brad Pitt/George Clooney need a bodyguard to be able to walk around in public. Women crave men's physical height and men's success. You ever noticed the young couples in your town ? its almost always a tall fella - no matter if she is tall or short or even ugly - always a tall bloke, certainly for younger couples.
 
Last edited:

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top