The bbc, again.

One of the many complaints about the BBC is the lack of funding for new programming.
They have to keep money back to pay off all of their staff that are forced to resign and to pay future legal costs.
I wonder will my job pay me off when I f*** up and have to resign? Will anyone else's? No, only the BBC pays off its paedos, weirdos and incompetents. Anyone paying the licence is literally a fool.
 
They have to keep money back to pay off all of their staff that are forced to resign and to pay future legal costs.
I wonder will my job pay me off when I f*** up and have to resign? Will anyone else's? No, only the BBC pays off its paedos, weirdos and incompetents. Anyone paying the licence is literally a fool.
They employ over 20,000 people but how many are directly involved in programme making?

How many are just middle management paper pushing bureaucrats. I'm not even talking about DEI hires just a bloated organisation with duplication all over the place. Even the last DG recognised that. Then there are the gold plated pensions and 4 staff taking 4 taxis when one shared taxi or the tube would have sufficed.

There are huge savings to be made but all the BBC does is moan that the licence fee is not enough.
 
No news outlet can be held legally responsible for what any individual decides to view via an unregulated third party over the internet. Anyone posting a clip is responsible for that themselves.

It’s different for regulated, licensed streaming services. Apparently there was such a licence holder for the Panorama documentary, based in Canada, but they have said no one in the USA who they relicense to, used it.

So it wasn’t legally seen there.
So no one with a computer could have logged onto BBC IPlayer, whether live or after the event? This is of course possible with a VPN, even if not “legal” ( debatable) it cannot be said no one in the US viewed it, as has been said on here, can it? So are they saying as no one viewed it legally that’s ok then?
 
So no one with a computer could have logged onto BBC IPlayer, whether live or after the event? This is of course possible with a VPN, even if not “legal” ( debatable) it cannot be said no one in the US viewed it, as has been said on here, can it? So are they saying as no one viewed it legally that’s ok then?
The question is one of proof.

And the burden is on Trump as plaintiff.
 


Apparently he received an anonymous email from a BBC executive containing voting statistics showing that he wasn't voted out.

Seems someone wasn't happy he got a picture with VP Vance. 🤷‍♂️
Haven't people figured it out yet? The BBC is infested with left wing 'woke' activists.

They will always try and tough it out because they think they have the moral high ground. They are arrogant and stupid in equal measure.
 
The question is one of proof.

And the burden is on Trump as plaintiff.
I'd say that the BBC being blatantly biased and untrustworthy is the takeaway, but you keep clutching at those straws.
 


Apparently he received an anonymous email from a BBC executive containing voting statistics showing that he wasn't voted out.

Seems someone wasn't happy he got a picture with VP Vance. 🤷‍♂️

Totally loony left wing corrupt organisation
 

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top