Owe you an apology 🤣🤣
What a ludicrous thing to say and it really speaks to your sense of self-importance.
I don’t owe anyone anything, and certainly not to one of the most brazen liars I’ve seen on here.
Here what’s Chat GPT says in response to the really convincing screenshotted Instagram story which says there’s no famine:
“
The headline you provided claims:
“UNICEF data show there was no famine in Gaza / The food-security agency … relied on unweighted sampling of data, while weighted data failed to meet famine conditions.”
Here’s how it matches (or doesn’t) the evidence:
- “UNICEF data show there was no famine in Gaza” — This is false. UNICEF (alongside other UN agencies) have acknowledged that famine has been confirmed in Gaza Governorate. UNICEF
 
- “The food-security agency … relied on unweighted sampling” — I found no credible source that publicly documents that the IPC explicitly used unweighted sampling instead of weighted, or stated that their analysis was “unweighted sampling” because weighted data failed.
 
- “Weighted data failed to meet famine conditions” — While critiques claim that the IPC changed thresholds or used MUAC instead of weight/height (which arguably lowers the bar), there is no clear published IPC statement that “weighted data failed” and therefore unweighted were used instead.
 
- Thus the headline misstates multiple things: It gets the outcome (no famine) wrong, mis-attributes the methodology claim without strong citation, and inverts the actual situation.
 
Really convincing stuff as ever.
An apology 🤣🤣🤣