Israel v Hamas

Penge Eagle said:
I find it interesting that you are unable to construct any meaningful counter arguments to my positions so are trying this line of attack. I also think the poster you refer to can fight his own battles.

A moderator is not disqualified from having opinions or taking part in discussions simply because they hold an administrative role.
Click to expand...
You do the same with any topic you don't agree with and then tell the recipient that they're deflecting and not as informed as you.
 
chris123 said:
You do the same with any topic you don't agree with and then tell the recipient that they're deflecting and not as informed as you.
Click to expand...

I actually respect silvertop for his posts as he is quite knowledgeable and respectful. Even though I disagree with much of what he says. I spend time reading and researching certain geopolitical topics as I find it interesting. I'm perfectly allowed to call him out on hypocrisy or deflection. You on the other hand are just a troll. Anyone can click on your profile and see how low grade your posts are that offer nothing to the conversation. You cannot even write more than two sentences 😂
 
Penge Eagle said:
I actually respect silvertop for his posts as he is quite knowledgeable and respectful. Even though I disagree with much of what he says. I spend time reading and researching certain geopolitical topics as I find it interesting. I'm perfectly allowed to call him out on hypocrisy or deflection. You on the other hand are just a troll. Anyone can click on your profile and see how low grade your posts are that offer nothing to the conversation. You cannot even write more than two sentences 😂
Click to expand...
You posted that he was deflecting twice on the bounce yesterday and being called a hypocrite is poor form.
 
Forest Hillbilly said:
A BBC statement. "Hamas has held a tight grip over the Gaza Strip since it forcibly took sole power there in 2007"

This doesn't make the statement true, but gives some credibility as it has been some time since Hamas took over, and probably easier to prop up with facts.

So the Palestinians haven't voted for terror. But they have lived under it in the form of Hamas, and now from indiscriminate massacring by the Israeli Government (and their proxy food distribution centres), through munitions, stopping of food, water and medicinal aid and destruction of their towns and cities.
Click to expand...

Typical propaganda.

"Gazans are oppressed by Hamas"
"Terror and death is Israel's fault"
 
chris123 said:
Well it's from a Norman point of view so maybe a tad biased?
Click to expand...

Even more so now thanks to the new BBC series with the racist blackwashing of European white history in it. The tapestry photoshopped to include sub Saharan black soldiers on the battlefield
 
Penge Eagle said:
Another troll. s*** stirring because you don't have the knowledge to debate a particular subject.
Click to expand...
An unfounded attack, PE.

You call me a troll because I call people out when they fling biased blather based on nothing but prejudice.

You ridicule me for commenting that people on here call out 'liberals' - accusing me of being drunk. Yet when I point actual cases out , you ignore the fact that I've pointed it out: silence.

No comment from you when so many on here 'gaslight' those who they call ''leftie, satanists, commies' etc: silence. Very selective.

It's a very convenient handle that, isn't it: "troll"?

You previously won't have an honest discussion about the torching of hotels, even when I offer up proof of the attitude prevalent on here after that terrible day. In denial.

Yes, you are correct that I know not enough about the history of the Israel conflict and therefore don't, by and large, comment on it here. If only others with the same lack of knowledge would also desist. Fat chance, eh.

I find you to be in bad faith.

Sorry.

That's what I feel and will write no more on the subject, for fear of drifting from the main topic.
 
Last edited:
The personal attacks and name-calling in here is almost perpetual. Cannot anyone voice an opinion without being the victim of personal attacks ?
 
Glazier#1 said:
An unfounded attack, PE.

You call me a troll because I call people out when they fling biased blather based on nothing but prejudice.

You ridicule me for commenting that people on here call out 'liberals' - accusing me of being drunk. Yet when I point actual cases out , you ignore the fact that I've pointed it out: silence.

No comment from you when so many on here 'gaslight' those who they call ''leftie, satanists, commies' etc: silence. Very selective.

It's a very convenient handle that, isn't it: "troll"?

You previously won't have an honest discussion about the torching of hotels, even when I offer up proof of the attitude prevalent on here after that terrible day. In denial.

Yes, you are correct that I know not enough about the history of the Israel conflict and therefore don't, by and large, comment on it here. If only others with the same lack of knowledge would also desist. Fat chance, eh.

I find you to be in bad faith.

Sorry.

That's what I feel and will write no more on the subject, for fear of drifting from the main topic.
Click to expand...

I just looked and 17 of your last 20 posts on this thread have been personal swipes on posters.

You claim you're only being called a troll because you "call people out," implying others are intolerant of truth or challenge. This is a classic bad-faith move by portraying yourself as the lone voice of reason surrounded by hypocrites.

You accuse others of "gaslighting" and being "selective," while doing exactly that yourself by cherry-picking examples to paint people who don't share your views as biased.

You say you "don’t know enough about the history of the Israel conflict" but still lecturing others to "desist," desperately trying to appear principled and humble.

"I will write no more on the subject" is more passive aggressiveness and performative flounce.
 
Penge Eagle said:
I just looked and 17 of your last 20 posts on this thread have been personal swipes on posters.

You claim you're only being called a troll because you "call people out," implying others are intolerant of truth or challenge. This is a classic bad-faith move by portraying yourself as the lone voice of reason surrounded by hypocrites.

You accuse others of "gaslighting" and being "selective," while doing exactly that yourself by cherry-picking examples to paint people who don't share your views as biased.

You say you "don’t know enough about the history of the Israel conflict" but still lecturing others to "desist," desperately trying to appear principled and humble.

"I will write no more on the subject" is more passive aggressiveness and performative flounce.
Click to expand...
Tips hat
 
Penge Eagle said:
I just looked and 17 of your last 20 posts on this thread have been personal swipes on posters.

You claim you're only being called a troll because you "call people out," implying others are intolerant of truth or challenge. This is a classic bad-faith move by portraying yourself as the lone voice of reason surrounded by hypocrites.

You accuse others of "gaslighting" and being "selective," while doing exactly that yourself by cherry-picking examples to paint people who don't share your views as biased.

You say you "don’t know enough about the history of the Israel conflict" but still lecturing others to "desist," desperately trying to appear principled and humble.

"I will write no more on the subject" is more passive aggressiveness and performative flounce.
Click to expand...
1) Yup
2) I was the one originally accused of 'gaslighting'. I point out your inability/reluctance to call out others who berate different opinions with gaslighting 'leftie, commie, satanist' charges. Yup: preferential and biased.
3) There you go again, twisting it around. My admission that, in honesty, I don't know much about the subject turned around to paint me as the offender. Bad faith. I mean, you're seriously telling me that all the posters on here about this subject are well-informed? Blimey! Oh well, you're the expert; who am I to disagree?
4) Flounce? Haha can't win with someone so deaf.
5) You call me 'passive aggressive' while, all the time showing what it's like to be simply aggressive.
6) If you call someone out for talking biased tripe, does that qualify as a 'personal swipe'? What is your post here? Is it a 'personal swipe'?
 
Last edited:
Forest Hillbilly said:
The personal attacks and name-calling in here is almost perpetual. Cannot anyone voice an opinion without being the victim of personal attacks ?
Click to expand...
There's a little squad of trolls who've been permitted to attack people as often as they want, over many, many months, because the moderator happens to share their opinion, and in fact in many cases seems to encourage the behaviour.

The thread now is an inevitable consequence of that.
 
CPFCSaturn said:
There's a little squad of trolls who've been permitted to attack people as often as they want, over many, many months, because the moderator happens to share their opinion, and in fact in many cases seems to encourage the behaviour.
Click to expand...
Wisbech, perpetually hounded, bullied, insulted with impunity.

Just about sums it up, really

But it's time to stop now for me on this thread, at the very real risk of
'passive aggressiveness and performative flounce.'
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top