Labour Party politics

Labour ran at the electorate with a "holier than thou" ticket and then get caught up in hypocrisy after hypocrisy.
They believed that having a plan to win, is the same as secretly having no plan to govern.
They keep persisting that have achieved successes, when the publicly available evidence is the complete opposite.

The wheels have truly come off and I have no faith in Labour having the ability to rectify the situation.
Well you are wrong because they had a fully costed manifesto.

Economic growth was 0.3% for the 2nd quarter and interest rates keep being cut with gilt yields rising. Debt is increasing and interest payments exceed education and defence spending. Everything is on the up.
 
Well you are wrong because they had a fully costed manifesto.

Economic growth was 0.3% for the 2nd quarter and interest rates keep being cut with gilt yields rising. Debt is increasing and interest payments exceed education and defence spending. Everything is on the up.
Labour’s manifesto offered no indication that there was a plan for where the money would come from to finance their strategies.
 
Starmer and the shadow cabinet said their manifesto was fully costed. Are you saying they’re all liars?
Labour claimed their manifesto was fully costed, however the degree to which their costings were credible was subject to much debate and scrutiny by independent bodies.

Labour, having blamed 14 Tory years for all their current woes have now given a 14 month lesson in how not to run the country.
 
Labour claimed their manifesto was fully costed, however the degree to which their costings were credible was subject to much debate and scrutiny by independent bodies.

Labour, having blamed 14 Tory years for all their current woes have now given a 14 month lesson in how not to run the country.
Tbh rishi was correct about the 2 k each.
What he didn’t say was that was a low ball amount 😳
 
Labour’s manifesto offered no indication that there was a plan for where the money would come from to finance their strategies.

Wasn't there economic bodies who approved their manifesto?

I seem to recall it being backed.

#I'm editing this because I've just looked it up. No organisations did but it had mass approval from very famous economists.

A letter published in The Guardian on June 19, 2024, signed by 17 economists, including Nobel Prize winners and former Bank of England officials, supported Labour’s economic agenda under Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves. Notable signatories included:
  • Joseph Stiglitz, Nobel laureate and professor at Columbia University.
  • Thomas Piketty, professor at the Paris School of Economics.
  • David Blanchflower, former Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee member.
  • Mariana Mazzucato, founding director of the Institute for Innovation and Public Policy at University College London.
  • Richard Layard, labour market expert and Labour peer.
These economists praised Labour’s focus on addressing economic stagnation, low productivity, and underinvestment in skills, infrastructure, and innovation, as well as its plans to improve post-Brexit trade with the EU and accelerate the net-zero transition. They described Labour’s approach as a “credible economic alternative” to the Conservative record of weak growth and higher taxes over the previous 14 years.

The IFS, in its analysis of Labour’s 2024 manifesto, noted that Labour’s proposed tax rises and spending increases were “tiny, going on trivial,” and while it acknowledged the focus on growth, it highlighted that the manifesto did not fully address fiscal trade-offs or provide detailed costings for all policies.

Additionally, over 100 business leaders signed a letter supporting Labour’s economic stability agenda, as reported by Reuters on May 28, 2024, though this was not an endorsement from an economic body but rather from private sector figures.
 
Wasn't there economic bodies who approved their manifesto?

I seem to recall it being backed.

#I'm editing this because I've just looked it up. No organisations did but it had mass approval from very famous economists.

A letter published in The Guardian on June 19, 2024, signed by 17 economists, including Nobel Prize winners and former Bank of England officials, supported Labour’s economic agenda under Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves. Notable signatories included:
  • Joseph Stiglitz, Nobel laureate and professor at Columbia University.
  • Thomas Piketty, professor at the Paris School of Economics.
  • David Blanchflower, former Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee member.
  • Mariana Mazzucato, founding director of the Institute for Innovation and Public Policy at University College London.
  • Richard Layard, labour market expert and Labour peer.
These economists praised Labour’s focus on addressing economic stagnation, low productivity, and underinvestment in skills, infrastructure, and innovation, as well as its plans to improve post-Brexit trade with the EU and accelerate the net-zero transition. They described Labour’s approach as a “credible economic alternative” to the Conservative record of weak growth and higher taxes over the previous 14 years.

The IFS, in its analysis of Labour’s 2024 manifesto, noted that Labour’s proposed tax rises and spending increases were “tiny, going on trivial,” and while it acknowledged the focus on growth, it highlighted that the manifesto did not fully address fiscal trade-offs or provide detailed costings for all policies.

Additionally, over 100 business leaders signed a letter supporting Labour’s economic stability agenda, as reported by Reuters on May 28, 2024, though this was not an endorsement from an economic body but rather from private sector figures.
Certainly NOT the 'Institute for Fiscal Studies' and others who argued that the figures were not sufficient to address underlying fiscal pressures.
 
Certainly NOT the 'Institute for Fiscal Studies' and others who argued that the figures were not sufficient to address underlying fiscal pressures.

Yep, I twitter posted the first of those 'Nobel' economists to tell them how full of sh1te they obviously are.
 
Labour in total chaos.
What on earth do their leading cheer leaders on this site, Dozy,Beaky,Spindle and Tiche,make of this collapse in Government ??
 
This promotion of a Muslim to Home Secretary feels like it’s Starmer’s reaction to a public opinion and push for Rayner to be sacked, just like his Southport protest reaction. He must know what people think. This authoritarian is a cvnt of the highest order. The worst PM in memory.
 

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top