Tommy Robinson

Common Sense Club said:
I am curious, Wisbech, as to why 2 of your grandchildren are transgender, and at what age their trans beliefs started to evolve. I appreciate that you may not or cannot comment on any specific physical attributes but I would question whether you or their parents indulged in illegal substances/alcohol etc to any great degree. There are rumours that certain recreational drugs ‘distort’ (for want of a better word), the early development of a baby’s life and particularly points to various high profile individuals having trans children, potentially due to their drug taking habits. You do not have to respond to this but I thought I’d throw this out there.
Click to expand...
I can assure you that neither they, nor their parents, are the type to mess with recreational drugs. At anytime in their lives. The grandchildren aren’t drinkers either. Their parents both enjoy real ale, as do I, but not excessively. As to when their transition started etc I will refrain from comment largely because much of it is unclear and therefore speculation.
 
Stirlingsays said:
'Drive them away'....funny way to look at it, no one had to leave, they just got tired of having their shirt handed to them. You're an exception because you'd the type who'd just take the shirt....no shame.

As for the rest of it.

I know of what you have sent as DMs to people on here.

So spare me the 'ganging' up and faux morality, you don't have any.....well not of a normal person anyway.
Click to expand...
That’s untrue because I very, very rarely send any private messages. If I do it’s generally as support to someone being bullied or to give some personal information. I have used it for ticket exchange purposes too.
 
PalazioVecchio said:
another case of your 'party trick' on HOL.......fill the thread with stuff with zero relevance to the title of the OP

WISBECH IS TROLLING THE THREAD WITH IRRELEVANT SHYTE
Click to expand...
Once again you need to check your facts.

I am either answering questions or commenting on claims made by others. If you don’t like the direction of the thread then aim your criticism at those who take it there.

Just examine the exchanges on religion for irrelevant shite.
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
That’s untrue because I very, very rarely send any private messages. If I do it’s generally as support to someone being bullied or to give some personal information. I have used it for ticket exchange purposes too.
Click to expand...
When the Russians invaded Ukraine, Stirling and I had some sharp exchanges on here as we held differing views about it. You PM'd me, inviting me to join you in an orchestrated attack on him concerning the subject.
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
I can assure you that neither they, nor their parents, are the type to mess with recreational drugs. At anytime in their lives. The grandchildren aren’t drinkers either. Their parents both enjoy real ale, as do I, but not excessively. As to when their transition started etc I will refrain from comment largely because much of it is unclear and therefore speculation.
Click to expand...

Wisbech, i just reported you to Mods for filling the thread with irrelevant shyte. Nothing to do with the OP, hundreds and hundreds of postings from you Wisbech. Reported.

And will all other HOL-Eagles do the same to Trolls please. Report them for ruining a good Palace website.
 
PalazioVecchio said:
not only is Wisbech writing irrelevant rubbish....he is also encouraging others to do so. Especially by engaging his conversations on the price of cabbage.
Click to expand...
I know.

Which is why I erased his arse from my sight weeks ago.

Arguing with loons is bad for your health.
 
PalazioVecchio said:
not only is Wisbech writing irrelevant rubbish....he is also encouraging others to do so. Especially by engaging his conversations on the price of cabbage.
Click to expand...
Not exactly on topic with your last few posts either.

Can you all please stick to the topic, and any questions about personal stuff or other non-relevant matters - deal with it by DM's and don't clutter up the boards for others.

Thank you.
 
becky said:
Not exactly on topic with your last few posts either.

Can you all please stick to the topic, and any questions about personal stuff or other non-relevant matters - deal with it by DM's and don't clutter up the boards for others.

Thank you.
Click to expand...

thanks Becky. I have just clicked on Wisbech's logo and chosen 'Ignore'. Can i also invite others to do so. So hopefully threads will henceforth stay on topic.

now............Tommy Robinson. And a question : what evidence that he actually is 'Far Right' ? cos, he is certainly never AntiSemitic. Nor Homophobic. And he has friends of all colours and genders. And seems to believe in Democracy & the rule of law to protect the weak and innocent.
what evidence ?
 
PalazioVecchio said:
thanks Becky. I have just clicked on Wisbech's logo and chosen 'Ignore'. Can i also invite others to do so. So hopefully threads will henceforth stay on topic.

now............Tommy Robinson. And a question : what evidence that he actually is 'Far Right' ? cos, he is certainly never AntiSemitic. Nor Homophobic. And he has friends of all colours and genders. And seems to believe in Democracy & the rule of law to protect the weak and innocent.
what evidence ?
Click to expand...
I asked ChatGPT to define “far right”. This is the reply. I leave to individuals to decide if YL meets the criteria but with such a term some will think he does, whilst others won’t. It inevitably depends on your own political perspective.

“The term “far right” generally refers to a cluster of political ideologies and movements that sit at the extreme end of the right-wing spectrum. While the exact definition can vary by country and context, some common features include:

Core Characteristics of the Far Right
  1. Nationalism and Nativism
    • Strong emphasis on national identity, often coupled with hostility toward immigrants, minorities, or outsiders.
    • May include beliefs that the nation should be “ethnically pure” or protected from cultural change.
  2. Authoritarianism
    • Preference for a strong, centralized authority and strict law-and-order policies.
    • May involve rejection of liberal democratic norms (free press, independent judiciary, pluralism).
  3. Populism
    • Positioning themselves as the voice of the “real people” against corrupt elites, outsiders, or institutions.
  4. Social Conservatism (taken to extremes)
    • Opposition to progressive values (e.g., feminism, LGBTQ+ rights, multiculturalism).
    • Desire to return to “traditional” hierarchies (family, religion, gender roles).
  5. Exclusionary or Supremacist Elements (in extreme cases)
    • Some far-right movements embrace xenophobia, racism, antisemitism, or conspiracy theories about minorities or global elites.
Distinguishing from Mainstream Right-Wing

Mainstream right-wing politics typically support free markets, limited government intervention, traditional values, and national pride, but operate within democratic frameworks.
  • Far right goes further: it often rejects pluralism, seeks to restrict rights for certain groups, and may endorse violence or authoritarian rule.
Examples (vary by context)

In Europe: groups opposing immigration and the EU, sometimes with openly racist or neo-fascist roots.
  • In the U.S.: white nationalist movements, militia groups, or extremist factions within right-wing politics

⚖️ Importantly, “far right” is a relative term: what’s considered “far right” in one country (e.g., advocating for monarchy restoration) might be seen differently in another.
 
PalazioVecchio said:
not only is Wisbech writing irrelevant rubbish....he is also encouraging others to do so. Especially by engaging his conversations on the price of cabbage.
Click to expand...
You are the first poster here ever to mention the price of cabbage. Which doesn’t have any more to do with YL than encouraging others to ignore me does!

I thought we were staying on subject!
 
The only thing with Tommy Robinson, is the fact that major media outlets marginalise him, don't give coverage, unless it's him being arrested.
I think his fan base might be worrying large for the established political parties to deal with if he was allowed media coverage
 
Forest Hillbilly said:
The only thing with Tommy Robinson, is the fact that major media outlets marginalise him, don't give coverage, unless it's him being arrested.
I think his fan base might be worrying large for the established political parties to deal with if he was allowed media coverage
Click to expand...
So the "victim" chose not to give evidence to the police. Does that mean that some things might come to light? e.g. he was lying about who started it? Perhaps he has activist links or has a criminal record himself.

Hopefully someone will identify this person so these questions can be put. If he was the instigator then why has he not been charged.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top