Daniel Munoz

[TheBigToePunt]

The financial argument for selling Munoz is clear, but even if one sticks to only thinking in those terms, the value of staying up is far greater.

As inevitable and understandable as our biggest sales have been, and as impossible as it is to replace some of those players with one remotely as good, we have nevertheless replaced outgoing players with downgrades at every turn. Mateta for Larsen (ultimately). Eze for Pino. Olise for even the excellent Sarr. Guehi for Canvot. Lacroix for whichever one you want. None of the players we could pick instead of Munoz are evidently as good as him.

That will catch us up in the end. There is a value to keeping established performers even if their transfer price reduces.

 

[ambrose7]

Love the guy but the last 6 months of last season he didn't look quite the same. I think we've seen his peak.

2 years left on his current deal and 30 so depreciating value from now. Brought in two younger options for the same price we are being offered plus Cardines out getting a season of experience... As soon as we signed Khalaili we looked over-resourced which suggested the club had made its decision.

Forest will offer him the stupidly high last big contract he wants. It makes a fair bit of sense for us.