• Existing user of old message board?

    Your username will have transferred over to this new message board, but your password will need to be reset. Visit our convert your account page, to transfer your old password over.

Tyrick Mitchell

Interesting piece, but as you say eagleman, it's unlikely he'll (be allowed to) make any move mid term, let alone to a country far from home.

He seems a likeable, but shy and reserved chap so a transfer to Turkey would be difficult for him to cope with psychologically.
 
A player who gets a lot of criticism and some of it unjustified in my opinion. A very good defensive left back. Clearly not really a wing back but not his fault he’s playing in a system that doesn’t play to his strengths. Always gives his best.
 
Palace Old Geezer said:
Interesting piece, but as you say eagleman, it's unlikely he'll (be allowed to) make any move mid term, let alone to a country far from home.

He seems a likeable, but shy and reserved chap so a transfer to Turkey would be difficult for him to cope with psychologically.
Click to expand...
It's a nut house!

Didn't Wilf have a lit flair chucked at his face as a mark of their love and respect?
 
ASCPFC said:
The club seemed to decide years ago that we can play with no left back, so it's hardly surprising.
Click to expand...

Or that it's a position which deserves no real attention.

Allardyce brought in PvA and Schlupp as part of the rescue package, then Mitchell was seen as adequate enough to fill that gap without further question.

I'm loathed to criticise Tyrick for a number of reasons however if we did invest there, I'd see it as appropriate and wouldn't envisage him working his way back into the fold.

'We could do/do with better' - I agree. 'TM is awful' - I disagree.
 
Nicholas91 said:
Or that it's a position which deserves no real attention.

Allardyce brought in PvA and Schlupp as part of the rescue package, then Mitchell was seen as adequate enough to fill that gap without further question.

I'm loathed to criticise Tyrick for a number of reasons however if we did invest there, I'd see it as appropriate and wouldn't envisage him working his way back into the fold.

'We could do/do with better' - I agree. 'TM is awful' - I disagree.
Click to expand...
Good post. As has already been said, if OG reverts to a back 4, TM is a shoe-in, if not, we need a proper LWB.
 
Nicholas91 said:
Or that it's a position which deserves no real attention.

Allardyce brought in PvA and Schlupp as part of the rescue package, then Mitchell was seen as adequate enough to fill that gap without further question.

I'm loathed to criticise Tyrick for a number of reasons however if we did invest there, I'd see it as appropriate and wouldn't envisage him working his way back into the fold.

'We could do/do with better' - I agree. 'TM is awful' - I disagree.
Click to expand...
This is very fair. Either way we need some depth there which we don’t have. If Mitchell gets injured we have are having to play someone out of position
 
To my mind Tyrick is a very decent left back for Palace (decent mid-table standard), but is clearly lacking as a wing-back. Was somewhat gobsmacked when he was selected for England however - he's certainly not at that standard.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Back
Top