Search results

  1. C

    Israel v Hamas

    Hamas voided the ceasefire on October 7th, before the ceasefire existed?
  2. C

    Israel v Hamas

    Tens of thousands. They all know what’s happening, it’s just too important for them to maintain a position on a football forum rather than concede they might have got it wrong. What’s 20,000 dead kids when a bit of pride on the internet is at stake, hey?
  3. C

    Israel v Hamas

    And again, you have to lie about my position, I don’t have to lie about yours.
  4. C

    Israel v Hamas

    You could be an Israeli spokesperson - just shamelessly bullshitting on behalf of a foreign government to try and justify a genocide. A new David Mencer. At least he’s made himself rich doing it.
  5. C

    Israel v Hamas

    I have no clue what discussion you think is being had, but it’s certainly not one I’m aware of.
  6. C

    Israel v Hamas

    I think Hamas are scumbags - this is further evidence of them being scumbags. Thanks for sharing. See how easy that is!? Why can’t you do it for Israel?
  7. C

    Israel v Hamas

    It’s nothing to do with liking or disliking what they say - it’s whether you accept them as a reliable source or not. To completely dismiss a source as biased and unreliable, but then lean on that same source when it suits you is obviously bullshit.
  8. C

    Israel v Hamas

    You can’t dismiss absolutely everything they’ve had to say and then suddenly use them as a source when they make a statement you like - topic aside, that’s just a completely bullshit approach.
  9. C

    Israel v Hamas

    And let me guess; the reports criticising Israel are the biased ones, and the ones that don’t criticise Israel aren’t 😂 That’s obviously not you projecting your own biases. Definitely not.
  10. C

    Israel v Hamas

    Ah so now the UN is an acceptable source! Good to know.
  11. C

    Israel v Hamas

    In the context, yes - stupid and disingenuous.
  12. C

    Israel v Hamas

    Stupid questions get stupid answers. You're dismissing a long list of hugely credible agencies, governments, journalists, doctors, academics as well as actual video evidence as 'pro Palestine sources and Hamas figures'.
  13. C

    Israel v Hamas

  14. C

    Palace Fans Against Racism

    Are we sure this fella isn't just trolling..? That was my first though on reading the OP... he's had some great bites if so.
  15. C

    Israel v Hamas

    Didn't we just do this like 2 days ago..? Reports of Israeli war crimes come from a huge range of sources: The UN. Doctors, journalists and aid volunteers within Gaza. Every human rights organisation on the planet. A litany of governments all around the world. Video evidence you can watch...
  16. C

    Israel v Hamas

    Ok, fair - Israel + a NATO report. You should think about asking that NATO report out the amount you talk about it :ROFLMAO:
  17. C

    Israel v Hamas

    I assumed TG would be able to read about 8 lines of a survey - clearly it was too complex.
  18. C

    Israel v Hamas

    Schooled on yet another point so naturally you start talking about October 7th. TG is really struggling today.
  19. C

    Israel v Hamas

    That's great - I didn't claim the vast majority considered it a genocide. The lack of basic comprehension amongst TG is STAGGERING.
  20. C

    Israel v Hamas

    Do you think this AI guff is a good argument? Can you highlight what with the question phrasing, or indeed the final detail release, of the surveys I shared that you feel could be considered biased? What are the leading questions? Pointing out that bias can sometimes exist is not an argument...

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top