Tens of thousands.
They all know what’s happening, it’s just too important for them to maintain a position on a football forum rather than concede they might have got it wrong.
What’s 20,000 dead kids when a bit of pride on the internet is at stake, hey?
You could be an Israeli spokesperson - just shamelessly bullshitting on behalf of a foreign government to try and justify a genocide.
A new David Mencer.
At least he’s made himself rich doing it.
I think Hamas are scumbags - this is further evidence of them being scumbags. Thanks for sharing.
See how easy that is!? Why can’t you do it for Israel?
It’s nothing to do with liking or disliking what they say - it’s whether you accept them as a reliable source or not.
To completely dismiss a source as biased and unreliable, but then lean on that same source when it suits you is obviously bullshit.
You can’t dismiss absolutely everything they’ve had to say and then suddenly use them as a source when they make a statement you like - topic aside, that’s just a completely bullshit approach.
And let me guess; the reports criticising Israel are the biased ones, and the ones that don’t criticise Israel aren’t 😂
That’s obviously not you projecting your own biases. Definitely not.
Stupid questions get stupid answers.
You're dismissing a long list of hugely credible agencies, governments, journalists, doctors, academics as well as actual video evidence as 'pro Palestine sources and Hamas figures'.
Didn't we just do this like 2 days ago..?
Reports of Israeli war crimes come from a huge range of sources:
The UN.
Doctors, journalists and aid volunteers within Gaza.
Every human rights organisation on the planet.
A litany of governments all around the world.
Video evidence you can watch...
Do you think this AI guff is a good argument?
Can you highlight what with the question phrasing, or indeed the final detail release, of the surveys I shared that you feel could be considered biased? What are the leading questions?
Pointing out that bias can sometimes exist is not an argument...