Search results

There are much simpler, and far more impactful levers we can pull to address declining birth rates - the existence of bisexual women is barely a consideration to any real discussion of that topic. The reason homosexuality has historically been opposed also had very little to do with birth...

Gay people existing doesn't threaten the continuation of the human race - straight people aren't going to stop having kids because homosexuality is accepted. It's also very hard to say you’re “opposed to homosexuality in practical terms” but not against individuals - those two things aren’t...

Great - that doesn't change the fact that Hitler and the Nazi regime were strongly opposed to homosexuality, and gay men in particular. Early Nazism had some exceptions, like Röhm, but as you acknowledge, this was violently ended and the repression intensified over time. Hitler also wasn't...

These are some very random ramblings, dude.

Absolutely rent free.

Hitler was famously a big fan of gay Jewish men.

You’re a little bit obsessed. Can you remind me when I’ve ‘kicked off’ and labelled a Tommy Robinson March as fascist..? It’s an interesting approach to invent a position for someone, and then accuse them of hypocrisy over the position you have invented for them. Painfully dumb.

You've just ignored yet another question, all while claiming to engage in debate. Dumb and dishonest.

What would be dishonest about deleting a post..? I've tried to engage with a debate on this and you don't have the honesty nor the intelligence to do it, so I thought let's move on from the childish sniping. Obviously childish sniping is your level.

I actually deleted the post because I didn't think it was worth continuing, but your dishonesty is staggering.

Just fundamentally dishonest and completely devoid of principle.

It would be pandemonium! And rightly so - I don't think football clubs should be doing that sort of thing. But we don't need to pretend it's not mixing politics and sport, nor do we need to buy some guff about 'apolitical', just because you happen to like the particular politician.

If Palace did the same with Polanski, then posted after saying '"don't worry, we're apolitical", do you think that would be considered acceptable on here and social media? You won't answer because you obviously know that it wouldn't.

Yes, very likely! But my point is that it's silly for either side to try and claim some sort of moral high ground on it - any football club who affiliate themselves with a political figure like that is going to get a negative reaction from somewhere. Just saying the word apolitical doesn't make...

Ok, so a POLITICIAN posing with a FOOTBALL club is not mixing politics and football for you? :ROFLMAO: I understand your point - I am making a different one, that you seem very hesitant to engage with - you have regularly presented that you have a strongly held principle, but don't at all seem...

Yeah I'm just highlighting that as someone who has presented themselves as strongly principally opposed to mixing politics and sport, I'd have thought you'd be outraged by this. The fact they've said they are claiming 'apolitical' is just funny - if you're going to allow a divisive politician...

I didn't say Parish said that, nor did I say selling Guehi was the wrong thing to do - I'm just pointing out that it was far from obvious that Guehi would go in January. It's not remotely a myth - all of the reporting at the time was that the club would likely now keep him to the expiration of...

A prominent politician using a football club for PR is very much mixing politics and sport, whichever way you want to spin it. Just imagine the fallout on here if Palace had a private tour and photo op with Polanksi - no doubt you would find it problematic then.

This feels like serious revisionism to me. The feeling following the failed bids in the summer was that we'd committed to losing him on a free the following year. Having turned down £35m in the summer, it was far from obvious that we'd get a more acceptable offer in the January.

Haven't you always argued we should 'keep politics out of football'..?