Search results

No, I think they meant it. Or at least it is what those who pull the strings intended. If we forget tired notions of right and left for a moment, they will brutally supress anyone who threatens their interests or goals. The question to ask is what is it about the 'Raise the Colours' movement...

Probably true, but unfortunately their alternatives seem even worse. We have PM who helped cover up the mass abuse of thousands of children, while being advised by a war criminal responsible for the deaths of one million Iraqis. How many times over should they have been buried? 40? 60? 100? I...

I'll bite Winston Churchill "I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes to spread a lively terror". I think the uncivilised tribes might have been justified in feeling a tad miffed. Sure we owe him one for 1940, etc But virtually all those who are held up as...

Piers Corbyn has some interesting views on man-made climate change. I doubt he would align with Trump or Farage on much else. I think you massively over-estimate the influence (and charisma) of both Trump and Farage. All the evidence suggests that it was the other way round, Farage and Trump...

You don't see any contradictions in that worldview?

The Tony Blair / Epstein connection

People not thinking about the positives of climate change

I don't think one necessarily has to have children or grandchildren to car about the future wellbeing of the planet. Nor do they need to be religious. I don't really see it in that nuts and bolts sort of way, nor is there a time-limit. I don't think the passing of my time on here as particularly...

Err ....I am pretty confident that that is the view of a very small minority. Most people intrinsically care about the welfare of their children, grandchildren, nieces, nephews and descendants. Altruism for future generations is pretty standard and basic across all creeds and cultures. There...

A noble sentiment. But one that might perhaps carry a bit more weight if you yourself didn't keep bringing in 'witch words' as if they were some sort of winning ace card to denigrate alternative viewpoints, even within your same post making the above appeal. E.g. Trump supporters, populists...

If you're this upset by the badger substituting Churchill, just imagine what you'd be like if it was Lenny Henry or Tony Blair they were replacing him with.

To be fair, badgers have actually shaped the country much more than King Charles or most of the other parasites. Much of public footpath network started out as badger routes through ancient forests.

Agree with a lot of that. But I don't think that first sentence is correct. Even most sceptics accept that man (and other genders) have some influence on the climate. The debate isn't the 'existence of man made climate change at all' but the extent of that influence, the degree to which it...

We're all sick of politicians and Royals. I'm very happy to see them replaced by hedgehogs and beavers.

The fact that you begin with a character assassination of Trump, even though we weren't previously talking about him, tells me everything. It is fairly obvious that ideological TDS and it's UK equivalent is your true, core motivation. The irony is, there is little science here - but hints of...

So you did a deep dive analysis of the papers I cited and typed out a reply all in 4 minutes ?! Well done. You just told us all we need to know about the thoroughness, objectivity and reliability of your 'analysis' and 'research'. :ROFLMAO:

Nope. There is a difference between parroting the socially acceptable view and properly investigating the facts The 97% Consensus Myth:- The claim that “97% of climate scientists agree” that humans are the primary cause of global warming is one of the most widely repeated- and misleading...

I'd say that a free thinker might ask some basic questions. Like who pays for and sponsors the data? What happens to the companies and scientists who produce the 'wrong' data? Or how about this one... Why have you almost certainly not heard of the former head of Greenpeace, Patrick Moore, who...

Obviously not. But equally, you don't get to label yourself a 'free-thinker' for believing the world is round. I am sure if Davos and the Royal Family, etc saw a benefit to themselves in convincing us the world was flat, then they would do so, and make it heretical to question. I am equally...