Recent content by CPFCSaturn

I think both Trump and Farage have survived a plethora of scandals which would have buried any 'ordinary' politician twenty times over.

You are probably correct that the debate is more around the extent of human influence on the climate, but I think when people try to present this as effectively nil, or present that human action makes negligible difference (I'm thinking when people start talking about ice age cycles and natural...

Absolutely - the run this season was atrocious, no argument at all. But it doesn't change the fact we were phenomenally good last year; genuinely capable of giving anyone in the country a game, and by a mile the best Palace team I've ever seen.

Sure, but it's often not just the projections being doubted - it's the existence of man-made climate change at all. I think the environmental movement has done a really shoddy job over the last few decades of communicating the issue in a way that brings people with them. Too often the message...

I get where you're coming from, but I just find the pretence that there is still some sort of doubt or uncertainty about man made climate change silly, particularly when it's based on lies and misrepresented data. Certainly no argument from me on the incapability of our politicians to plan for...

It's not a deep-dive at all - it's surface-level cutting through of bullshit. It was quick because it was easy. You're obviously welcome to actually address the content of what I've said - I would've thought a free-thinker interested in finding the truth would welcome such critiquing.

Grow up.

This is such a mish-mash of half-truths and tetchy logic to deny what is a very obvious truth - the overwhelming majority of climate scientists and experts agree on what is happening. You're treating 'no position' papers as if they should count against the consensus, which is not at all...

Are the comparisons to Royball just based on defensive solidity? Because I really don’t see any similarities other than that. The volume and quality of chances we have always created under Glasner absolutely dwarfs what we did under Hodgson. We press far higher up the pitch, and actually look...

This stuff is already accounted for in climate science - the limitations of old equipment, unreliability of readings etc, is very much factored in - in fact the revised data often shows less warming than the original historic data did! But the overall trend is still the same. I do also think...

There is no one body or organisation collecting or paying for data - we’re talking thousands and thousands of individuals, companies and devices, across the globe. Does the question of funding also extend to Patrick Moore and other sceptics? He looks to have made a pretty good career for...

This is a much better critique of climate models than just pretending it’s not real. There’s an enormous amount of data supporting climate change - funny enough that’s why there’s such agreement about what’s happening! Examples would include temperature records, sea levels, CO2 monitoring...

Just highlighting the logical fallacy. The evidence for climate change doesn’t come from Davos or the BBC. If every politician disappeared tomorrow, the data would still point to the same conclusions - it’s not worried about whether Davos attendees believe it or not. Is a free thinker...

It's the mainstream position that the earth is round or that gravity exists. The Royal Family and Davos probably also think the earth is round. Does that mean the earth isn't round?

Oh, the one not remotely concluded as a ‘town’ or submerged civilisation. Of course the climate changes naturally - it’s about the rate of change.