Coming two weeks after the murder of Ann Widdlecombe it's really foolish.
I doubt it's deliberate and it's more likely to be thoughtlessness.....but you can hardly blame Reform for being touchy at the moment.
It is 100% deliberate.
Coming two weeks after the murder of Ann Widdlecombe it's really foolish.
I doubt it's deliberate and it's more likely to be thoughtlessness.....but you can hardly blame Reform for being touchy at the moment.
England
His post was just a sad old troll trying to be provocative, he doesn't even believe in half of what he posts.You have zero principles. What a disgraceful comment. Who knew it would be from a c*** like you.
England
Of course it isn’t! Your incurable prejudice means that even the obvious is obscured.It is 100% deliberate.
England
Have you stopped to consider that the use of the guillotine image could be figuritive? Wanting to cast Reform to the dustbin of history? There’s no actual threat, nor incitement to others. It was careless and thoughtless but also never supported when reposted along with others.Well, when you chop someone's head off you are technically creating two peaces.....sorry two pieces.
This just proves how dim or malicious those people were on the left to complain about Farage needing funds for security.
England
He most certainly is not. Read the statement the Party issued.Oh. Absolutely that is. How's it different to Connelly? It's worse, he's the leader of a party calling for violence against his rival.
How can our leftists defend this? Oh, they're ignoring it?
But the party and the BBC missed out that Polanski shared the image.He most certainly is not. Read the statement the Party issued.
![]()
Reform UK reporting Green leader Zack Polanski to police over Instagram post
The post included a photo of a man wearing a top featuring the name "Nigel" alongside an image of a guillotine.www.bbc.co.uk
England
Trump does far worse than this all the time, often without any comment at all. We being so conditioned to it.Imagine if Trump had done something like that.....He would have zero excuses and would be doing his usual rant.
But because it's his anti white tribe he'll fall over himself to make excuses.
Some of which I agree with....but unlike him I think it applies across the board left or right of any type.
And I also recognise that people like Farage need proper security because of the extra threat from the far left.
England
No they didn’t. You cannot unshare something without first sharing it!But the party and the BBC missed out that Polanski shared the image.
Scotland
They must have missed it or it wouldn't have appeared in the first place. Unless it was deliberately included.No they didn’t. You cannot unshare something without first sharing it!
England
England
Opinions now need protection even if they are no where near the law.Trump does far worse than this all the time, often without any comment at all. We being so conditioned to it.
Farage needs security because of his controversial opinions. Just like others with views that divide they tend to enrage some. Not just those on the “far left” though. I know some very middle of the road types who get very wound up by him. Not that they would ever consider violence as an answer but there are nut jobs out there who might.
So I agree he needs protection, and to listen to those charged with protecting him so he takes sensible precautions.
England
“Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense.” [Orwell]Have you stopped to consider that the use of the guillotine image could be figuritive? Wanting to cast Reform to the dustbin of history? There’s no actual threat, nor incitement to others. It was careless and thoughtless but also never supported when reposted along with others.
Far too much is being made of a bag of nothing. In future the Greens will be more careful when blanket publishing pictures of one of their events.
England
That makes no sense at all!They must have missed it or it wouldn't have appeared in the first place. Unless it was deliberately included.
England
When what you dismiss as a “mean tweet” has the capacity to incentivise others to violence, yes they do. It’s against the law. An innocent republishing of someone else’s picture, without comment, let alone endorsement, is not remotely comparable.No one wants to see people arrested and jailed for mean tweets. The looney lefties started this so they can take a dose of their own medicine.
England
My interpretation is that it is an image showing someone "getting the chop". An expression that goes back generations meaning to lose your job, not your head.Imagine if Trump had done something like that.....He would have zero excuses and would be doing his usual rant.
But because it's his anti white tribe he'll fall over himself to make excuses.
Some of which I agree with....but unlike him I think it applies across the board left or right of any type.
And I also recognise that people like Farage need proper security because of the extra threat from the far left.
England
England
No. It’s just a fact of life to accept that the mentally unstable exist and that those who promote controversial and divisive views run a risk of attention from them. Whichever side of politics they inhabit.Opinions now need protection even if they are no where near the law.
Do you not see the irony in that !
England
When what you dismiss as a “mean tweet” has the capacity to incentivise others to violence, yes they do. It’s against the law. An innocent republishing of someone else’s picture, without comment, let alone endorsement, is not remotely comparable.
England
Imagine if Trump had done something like that.....He would have zero excuses and would be doing his usual rant.
But because it's his anti white tribe he'll fall over himself to make excuses.
Some of which I agree with....but unlike him I think it applies across the board left or right of any type.
And I also recognise that people like Farage need proper security because of the extra threat from the far left.