Restore Britain.

[DanH]

The biggest load of nonsense I've ever heard.

All to distract from what Lowe actually said on that podcast.

Because it puts this so called caring establishment to shame.

Quite the gaffe. If it was an innocent mistake I’m sure an apology will be forthcoming.

 

[Stirlingsays]

Quite the gaffe. If it was an innocent mistake I’m sure an apology will be forthcoming.

Of course it's a gaffe.

The idea that he's insulting the victims is insane and utterly bad faith from most.

Surely an apology should only happen when it's an intended insult.

I'm sure Lowe will refer to it at some point.

 

[Hrolf The Ganger]

Well that went well for him 🤭

Restore Britain leader describes Dunblane tragedy as 'one murder'

Rupert Lowe criticised the ban of handguns in the UK, saying it was "because there was a murder in Dunblane".

www.bbc.co.uk

You seem obsessed with opposition. It's a bit sad.

You're really just a troll aren't you.

 

[Spindle]

Well that went well for him 🤭

Restore Britain leader describes Dunblane tragedy as 'one murder'

Rupert Lowe criticised the ban of handguns in the UK, saying it was "because there was a murder in Dunblane".

www.bbc.co.uk

Good old BBC, on the ball immediately to run him into the ground on a technicality. Why was it even brought up? Just to highlight that white people can mass kill too? Yet they had to go back 30 years.

 

[DanH]

Good old BBC, on the ball immediately to run him into the ground on a technicality. Why was it even brought up? Just to highlight that white people can mass kill too? Yet they had to go back 30 years.

He literally brought it up himself on the Joe Rogan podcast. The BBC are reporting the words, that he used unprompted, and confirmed again.

If he wants to be taken seriously and credibly he will be held account just as any other politician will be.

 

[Cucking Funt]

Good old BBC, on the ball immediately to run him into the ground on a technicality. Why was it even brought up? Just to highlight that white people can mass kill too? Yet they had to go back 30 years.

It was hardly a 'technicality'. It was a crass, ill-considered and stupid thing to say and he was rightly called out on it.

 

[DanH]

It was hardly a 'technicality'. It was a crass, ill-considered and stupid thing to say and he was rightly called out on it.

Well said, sexy.

 

[cryrst]

It was hardly a 'technicality'. It was a crass, ill-considered and stupid thing to say and he was rightly called out on it.

I remember dunblane. I Shed a few tears looking at the photos of the poor babes shot by that c***, as many including Lowe probably did.i think It was a slip of the tongue, not a deliberate sentence to upset anyone !

 

[DanH]

I remember dunblane. I Shed a few tears looking at the photos of the poor babes shot by that c***, as many including Lowe probably did.i think It was a slip of the tongue, not a deliberate sentence to upset anyone !

Why hasn’t he apologised for his mistake then?

Even if it was a slip of the tongue do you not think it extremely crass to try and downplay Dunblane to try and justify relaxing handgun rules so that rich people can go out hunting more?

 

[cryrst]

Why hasn’t he apologised for his mistake then?

Even if it was a slip of the tongue do you not think it extremely crass to try and downplay Dunblane to try and justify relaxing handgun rules so that rich people can go out hunting more?

He’s trying to make a point. Without being crass just maybe the future direction of the country may mean we need to have protection ! If welfare breaks down you join the dots !

 

[Stirlingsays]

Why hasn’t he apologised for his mistake then?

Even if it was a slip of the tongue do you not think it extremely crass to try and downplay Dunblane to try and justify relaxing handgun rules so that rich people can go out hunting more?

Apologizing for others deliberately misinterpreting a statement?

What he meant was obvious and those lying about it are contempable.

 

[Stirlingsays]

It was hardly a 'technicality'. It was a crass, ill-considered and stupid thing to say and he was rightly called out on it.

Cuck indeed.

 

[DanH]

He’s trying to make a point. Without being crass just maybe the future direction of the country may mean we need to have protection ! If welfare breaks down you join the dots !

He wants to relax handgun laws. Would you be OK with that?

 

[DanH]

Apologizing for others deliberately misinterpreting a statement?

What he meant was obvious and those lying about it are contempable.

Ignoring another Americanised spelling if it was obvious why hasn’t he just held his hands up and said it was?

We all make f*ck ups and just apologise, clarify and move on. It’s not that difficult to do and he wouldn’t lose any face.

 

[Stirlingsays]

Ignoring another Americanised spelling if it was obvious why hasn’t he just held his hands up and said it was?

It's a valid spell for both countries, just as the English version is......You little Englanders eh.

We all make f*ck ups and just apologise, clarify and move on. It’s not that difficult to do and he wouldn’t lose any face.

I've already answered this.

I'm fine if he does or doesn't.

It's obvious manufactured outrage as it's obvious what he meant.

 

[Stirlingsays]

He wants to relax handgun laws. Would you be OK with that?

It would certainly make the weekends more intensive in the inner cities.

Wouldn't nice civilised places that much.

 

[DanH]

It would certainly make the weekends more intensive in the inner cities.

Wouldn't nice civilised places that much.

Like Dunblane?

 

[Mattconrov]

This is all very silly; Lowe knows there were several children murdered at Dunblane.

It's just semantics at play. Point scoring on this is slight embarrassing.

There is a lot more to the Dunblane murders that meet the eye in my opinion.

Sealed documents from the case, to be kept from the public eye for 100 years I seem to recall. Why?

 

[Stirlingsays]

This is all very silly; Lowe knows there were several children murdered at Dunblane.

It's just semantics at play. Point scoring on this is slight embarrassing.

There is a lot more to the Dunblane murders that meet the eye in my opinion.

Sealed documents from the case, to be kept from the public eye for 100 years I seem to recall. Why?

Good question.

It's either the over use of state secrecy....something very common.....it's an abuse of the original intent.

Or there is something murky.

Goodness knows.

 

[Stirlingsays]

Like Dunblane?

Indeed.....We know about it exactly because it was Dunblane.

You will get one offs.

But no one even bothers with mass shootings that happen every weekend in certain American cities and elsewhere.

Some of them are even recorded on cctv cameras......and no one bats an eye.