US Politics

Forest Hillbilly said:
Slightly disappointed, thus far. I was hoping for a Trump hair malfunction, or even an appearance by Senior Royals, Harry and Meghan.
All seems to be going smoothly, even if the guards are a tad short, and Royal Etiquette has been dropped for Trump.
Click to expand...
It's a shame the Queen missed the opportunity to let loose a few window rattling Racquel Welches after two Big Macs and bucket of Diet Coke. She might have enjoyed that.
 
eaglesdare said:
Obama's words wont erase the evidence which is Discord chats, targeted note, DNA, and leftist slogans on casings.

Robinson's family have already confirmed his radical shift.

The pattern of leftist rage is clear and dismissing it only fuels the toxicity which you are now apart of.

Extremes aren't equal the data points to one side here.
Click to expand...
Of course they won’t and to even suggest that anyone thinks they might only confirms what he has said.

If you think the extreme right are less of an issue than the extreme left you are deluded.
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
Of course they won’t and to even suggest that anyone thinks they might only confirms what he has said.

If you think the extreme right are less of an issue than the extreme left you are deluded.
Click to expand...

The evidence is there with discord chats, targeted note, DNA, leftist slogans, Robinson's confirmed radicalisation. This all points to a clear pattern of leftist rage.

Ignoring this data is like denying the sky is blue which is delusional with a side of denial.
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
It’s you that’s in denial!

The fact is that some people do stupid things doesn’t mean they all do.

That people on extremes do extreme things doesn’t mean that all do. Extremes exist on both the right and the left.

People of good will, on both sides, are trying to close the gaps. People like Trump and, it seems, you are trying to widen it.

I am about to post what Obama has said about this. I suggest you read it and then maybe you will get the point.
Click to expand...

Just wondering how you reacted when Trump did that famous "both sides" thing a few years back...
 
eaglesdare said:
The evidence is there with discord chats, targeted note, DNA, leftist slogans, Robinson's confirmed radicalisation. This all points to a clear pattern of leftist rage.

Ignoring this data is like denying the sky is blue which is delusional with a side of denial.
Click to expand...
It all confirms rage for sure! Of one man who probably had left leaning views and was angry with people who reject the rights of transgenders to be themselves.

That won’t be ignored by the court which tries him.

What must be ignored are the attempts to tar millions of other people with the same brush.

Read what Obama said!
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
It all confirms rage for sure! Of one man who probably had left leaning views and was angry with people who reject the rights of transgenders to be themselves.

That won’t be ignored by the court which tries him.

What must be ignored are the attempts to tar millions of other people with the same brush.

Read what Obama said!
Click to expand...

The chats, note, DNA, slogans, and Robinson's radicalisation show a broader pattern of leftist rage. Not just one man.

The court will judge him but ignoring the trend tars truth with denial. The data is clear that rage is brewing.

As for Obama a man dies and the first thing he does is blame the one who didn’t pull the trigger and then goes on to condemn the beliefs of the one who got shot. Straight out of the ridiculous leftist playbook that you seem to read from aswell.
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
There is no deflection at all. It’s just pointing out the obvious truth that one individual does not, and cannot, be representative of a group. If the suspect turns out to have become a devoted follower of Chairman Mao it doesn’t mean the whole left thinking world wants to murder opponents. It just means that those on the political extremes take extreme actions. Both extremes. You can trawl through far right media to find online rage and poison. You don’t have to look that far. You can find it here too. In talking about the “left” as you do, you spread hate.

I don’t think the family have said he became “hard left”. They said he became political. Not that it really matters. What matters is that he is just a single individual.

The words from FBI Chief Patel yesterday were disgraceful. They show just how political the leadership of the FBI is under Trump as they weren’t measured and factual. They included the kind of opinions you are now spouting. Disgraceful!
Click to expand...
Unless it’s TR in a group then they are all far right! Okay I get it 👍
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
It all confirms rage for sure! Of one man who probably had left leaning views and was angry with people who reject the rights of transgenders to be themselves.

That won’t be ignored by the court which tries him.

What must be ignored are the attempts to tar millions of other people with the same brush.

Read what Obama said!
Click to expand...
When did Kirk reject the rights of trannies.
He just didn’t want them sharing personal spaces with real women and kids.
The majority of the planet agreed with him.
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
It all confirms rage for sure! Of one man who probably had left leaning views and was angry with people who reject the rights of transgenders to be themselves.

That won’t be ignored by the court which tries him.

What must be ignored are the attempts to tar millions of other people with the same brush.

Read what Obama said!
Click to expand...
From another man who probably has left leaning views (sorry for any offence if I have misgendered you.)
 
www.bbc.co.uk

Jimmy Kimmel taken off air over Charlie Kirk comments

The late-night host said on Monday that Trump's allies were "doing everything they can to score political points from" Kirk's death.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk

Jimmy Kimmel taken off air.

Several points to make here.

1. There has never been freedom of speech on mainstream American TV. it is largely controlled by the advertisers. In fact there is a long history of sacking people especially if their sponsors are unhappy. You only have to look at the number of shows featuring black people in the fifties that were cancelled because the advertisers were unhappy or the anti communist witch-hunts. It has continued to this day for different reasons of course. Tim Allen lost his popular TV sitcom because he is a conservative.

2. I have no idea how successful Kimmel's show is / was. It may well be that ABC was looking for an excuse to to cancel his show anyway and he has given then a gift. No doubt people who know will correct me on this.

3. I note that the Hollywood luvvies are lining up to condemn it and demand free speech. Odd that you never hear them condemn people being de-platformed by their lot.

4. Is what he said that bad? I've only seen the comments from BBC and whilst I think he is wrong in the scheme of things this is more about bad taste than actually vileness.

Still you reap what you saw. The left are always demanding people be banned, well what goes around comes around.
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
There is no deflection at all. It’s just pointing out the obvious truth that one individual does not, and cannot, be representative of a group. If the suspect turns out to have become a devoted follower of Chairman Mao it doesn’t mean the whole left thinking world wants to murder opponents. It just means that those on the political extremes take extreme actions. Both extremes. You can trawl through far right media to find online rage and poison. You don’t have to look that far. You can find it here too. In talking about the “left” as you do, you spread hate.

I don’t think the family have said he became “hard left”. They said he became political. Not that it really matters. What matters is that he is just a single individual.

The words from FBI Chief Patel yesterday were disgraceful. They show just how political the leadership of the FBI is under Trump as they weren’t measured and factual. They included the kind of opinions you are now spouting. Disgraceful!
Click to expand...


Ha ha ha! So the fact that the "group" that he doesn't represent are currently being fired from their jobs for cheering this assassination.

Here you are saying "one individual does not, and cannot, be representative of a group" and then in the same post finish with saying that the FBI chief is a dsigrace because he's representing opinions from Trump. How does that work then according to your logic?

So when your mate Bob sings about "Death to the IDF" and you don't condemn it how do you explain that against your logic about groups? Sure one IDF pilot dropping a Mk82 on a bunch of Gazans doesn't represent the IDF.
 
Stirlingsays said:
I'll have Musk, you enjoy your pie.
Click to expand...

For all your opinions, many of which I agree with, I just don't get how you lend your ear so much to the most sinister and untrustworthy on the planet. Putin, and now Musk.
 
Spindle said:
For all your opinions, many of which I agree with, I just don't get how you lend your ear so much to the most sinister and untrustworthy on the planet. Putin, and now Musk.
Click to expand...

It's a reasonable question....I don't really have the time to answer it right now, but I will later.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top