Bit confused about UEFA coefficients!!!

[andyachtie]

Why have we got the same points as Bounemouth and Sunderland neither of which has done anything in Europe, let alone won a competition!!!!

 

[Dumademption]

Why have we got the same points as Bounemouth and Sunderland neither of which has done anything in Europe, let alone won a competition!!!!
View attachment 3611

The point value used for seeding is the highest of the clubs individual score compared to 20% of the clubs nations score. We scored 21.875 points however 20% of the score for England is 23.903 hence that is used.

 

[andyachtie]

The point value used for seeding is the lowest of the clubs individual score compared to 20% of the clubs nations score. We scored 21.875 points however 20% of the score for England is 23.903 hence that is used.

But why the same as Bournemouth and Sunderland?

 

[Dumademption]

But why the same as Bournemouth and Sunderland?

Sorry I had meant to say the highest of the two, not lowest. Have edited my comment above. They both have 0 club score and 23.903 nation score hence the same nation score is used for them.

 

[andyachtie]

The point value used for seeding is the lowest of the clubs individual score compared to 20% of the clubs nations score. We scored 21.875 points however 20% of the score for England is 23.903 hence that is used.

But why the same points as Bournemouth and Sunderland? Seems ridiculous.

 

[doombear]

The point value used for seeding is the highest of the clubs individual score compared to 20% of the clubs nations score. We scored 21.875 points however 20% of the score for England is 23.903 hence that is used.

If all the English ones have to be the same, why have the two Italian teams got different points?

 

[Dumademption]

If all the English ones have to be the same, why have the two Italian teams got different points?

I had meant to say highest in my original comment not lowest so there may be some confusion here from that.

If the clubs individual score is higher than 20% of the nations then that is used which is the case for the Italian teams hence they differ. For us the nations score is higher than our individual score and same for Bournemouth and Sunderland so we all are using the nations score.

 

[doombear]

I had meant to say highest in my original comment not lowest so there may be some confusion here from that.

If the clubs individual score is higher than 20% of the nations then that is used which is the case for the Italian teams hence they differ. For us the nations score is higher than our individual score and same for Bournemouth and Sunderland so we all are using the nations score.

Ah! Thanks for clarifying. Makes sense now. If we win the Europa then presumably we'll get above the nation's score.

 

[mogrem]

Ah! Thanks for clarifying. Makes sense now. If we win the Europa then presumably we'll get above the nation's score.

Aston Villa is at 70k but they had CL during the last 5 years as well. They are actually ahead of United.

 

[Dumademption]

Ah! Thanks for clarifying. Makes sense now. If we win the Europa then presumably we'll get above the nation's score.

Individual scores are the total score of the last 5 seasons and I believe for the Europa League you are guaranteed a minimum of 3 points regardless of how badly you do. So whatever happens if we qualify for Europe again next season we will start moving up the coefficient table.